tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7995942807019832501.post4786316510035998381..comments2023-08-08T06:19:10.970-04:00Comments on Mediterranean Ceramics: RDFa Patterns for Ancient World ReferencesSebastian Heathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00323339285494849021noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7995942807019832501.post-83317644545864541102010-05-29T06:36:23.937-04:002010-05-29T06:36:23.937-04:00Sebastian,
I see. No, this is not really about co...Sebastian,<br /><br />I see. No, this is not really about conneg in the first place. This is an additional, orthogonal issue.<br /><br />However, coming back to the core issue here - I can't imagine that you *really* want to state that, for example, a span element in your HTML document is of type foaf:Person, or? :)<br /><br />Cheers,<br />MichaelMichael Hausenblashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14137615634083089753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7995942807019832501.post-70075079302375272252010-05-28T15:02:21.272-04:002010-05-28T15:02:21.272-04:00Hi Michael,
Thanks for the comment. I do under...Hi Michael,<br /><br /> Thanks for the comment. I do understand the issue. As described, the use of fragment identifiers was intentional. The issues probably go beyond a comment on an old post, but I too briefly summarize by asking: in a situation where xhtml+rdfa is the rdf serialization, do we have to worry about content negotiation/http issues? Also, though there might be some contortion involved, I do mean to be saying something about the xhtml itself: that it's the instantiation of the concept within the text and is related by owl:sameAs.<br /><br /> None of this is quite to disagree. Only to say that I think the issue perhaps becomes different when the html and rdf representation are combined via the mechanism of RDFa. Is that a content-negotiation free scenario. Particularly if the content isn't being delivered over http, but via a file system? Perhaps this is worth a post of its own.<br /><br /> -SebastianSebastian Heathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00323339285494849021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7995942807019832501.post-21319526182186482482010-05-28T14:46:55.511-04:002010-05-28T14:46:55.511-04:00Very nice use case and great post! Just one thing ...Very nice use case and great post! Just one thing to note: please don't 'reuse' the @id values in the @about as subjects unless you really want to state something about the HTML element (paragraph, etc.) at hand. <br /><br />I tried to explain it in [1] and [2] - if something is unclear, please lemme know and I try to be more specific.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />Michael<br /><br />[1] http://ld2sd.deri.org/lod-ng-tutorial/#checklist-fragid<br />[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDFa/FragmentIdentifiersMichael Hausenblashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14137615634083089753noreply@blogger.com